Academic/Government Aerospace & Defense Automotive Chemicals Electronics Oil & Gas Personal & Home Care Pharma/Biotech
SciTegic Pipeline Pilot - Data Analysis and Reporting Platform Accord - Cheminformatics Software Materials Studio - Materials Modeling and Simulation Software Discovery Studio - Life Science Modeling and Simulation Software Additional Products
Overview Contract Research Implementation Solutions Consulting Support Training
Overview Scientific Business Intelligence Nanotechnology Consortium Biological Registration Special Interest Group Collaborators
Freeware Trials Product Updates
Conferences Seminars Training User Group Meetings Webinars
Application Guides Case Studies Publications Presentations White Papers
Overview Careers Contact Customers Investor Relations Legal Information Locations Management and Governance Press Releases Strategic Alliances
 

Discovery Studio Scientific References

Browse References by Application Area

 

Protein Modeling and Sequence Analysis

Biopolymer Buliding and Analysis

Simulations

Structure-Based Design

Ligand-Based Design

Pharmacophore Modeling and Analysis

QSAR and Library Design

ADMET

 

Protein Modeling and Sequence Analysis

  1. Spassov, V., Yan, L. and Flook, P. “The Dominant Role of Side-chain Backbone Interactions in Structural Realization of Amino-acid Code. ChiRotor: a Side-chain Prediction Algorithm Based on Side-chain Backbone Interactions,” Protein Science , 2007
  2. Marti-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S. and Sali, A., “Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles”, Protein Science , 2004 , 13 , 1071–1087
  3. Eswar, N., Eramian, D., Webb, B., Shen, M., Sali. A. Protein Structure Modeling With MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2006, Supplement 15 , 5.6.1-5.6.30
  4. Li L, Chen R (joint first authors), Weng Z, RDOCK: Refinement of Rigid-body Protein Docking Predictions. Proteins , 2003 , 53 , 693–707
  5. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z, ZDOCK: An Initial-stage Protein-Docking Algorithm. Proteins, 2003 , 52 , 80 – 87
  6. Morea, V., Lesk, A., and Tramontano, A. “Antibody Modeling: Implications for Engineering and Design,” METHODS , 2000 , 20 , 267.
  7. Sali, A., Pottertone, L., Yuan, F., van Vlijmen, H., and Karplus, M., “Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER,” Proteins , 1995 , 23 , 318.
  8. Brooks,B.R.,Bruccoleri,R.E.,Olafson,B.D.,States,D.J.,Swaminathan,S.,and Karplus, M., “CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations,” J. Comput. Chem. , 1983 , 4 , 187-217.

Biopolymer Building and Analysis

  1. Honig, B., Sharp, K., Yang, A.S., J. Phys. Chem. , 1993 , 97 , 1101.
  2. Nicholls, A., and Honig, B., J. Comp. Chem. , 1991 , 12 , 435.
  3. Sharp, B., Nichols, A., Friedman, R., and Honig, B., Biochemistry , 1991 , 30 , 9686.

Simulations

  1. Spassov, VZ, et al. “The dominant role of side-chain backbone interactions in structural realization of amino acid code. ChiRotor: a side-chain prediction algorithm based on side-chain backbone interactions”, Protein Sci. , 2007 , 16(3) , 494-506.
  2. Nimlos, MR at al. “Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of Family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface”, Protein Eng. Des. Sel. , 2007 , 20(4) , 179-87.
  3. Foloppe, N. et al. ”Structure-based design of novel Chk1 inhibitors: insights into hydrogen bonding and protein-ligand affinity” J. Med. Chem. , 2005 , 48(13) , 4332-45.
  4. Spassov, VZ, et al. “LOOPER: A Molecular Mechanics Based Algorithm for Protein Loop Prediction”, Accepted, Protein Engineering, Design and Selection

Structure-Based Design

  1. Yu, H. et al. “The discovery of novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitors: pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening and docking studies” Chem Biol Drug Des. , 2007 , 69(3) , 204-11
  2. Sato, H. Et al. “Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance”, J Chem Inf Model. , 2006 , 46(6), 2552-62.
  3. Warren G.L., et al. “A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions”, J. Med. Chem., 2006 , 49 , 5912.
  4. Rao et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model (submitted)
  5. Warren, GL et al. “A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions”, J. Med. Chem . 2006 , 49(20) , 5912-31.
  6. Erickson et al. J Med Chem . 2004 , 47(1), 45-55.

Receptor-Ligand Interactions

Ligandfit

  1. Taha, M.O., and AlDamen, M.A., "Effects of Variable Docking Conditions and Scoring Functions on Corresponding Protein-Aligned Comparative Molecular Field Analysis Models Constructed from Diverse Human Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B Inhibitors," J. Med. Chem., 2005 , 48 , 8016-8034.
  2. Taha, M.O., Qandil, A.M., Zaki, D.D., and AlDamen, M.A., "Ligand-Based Assessment of Factor Xa Binding Site Flexibility via Elaborate Pharmacophore Exploration and Genetic Algorithm-Based QSAR Modeling," Eur. J. Med. Chem. , 2005 , 40 , 701-727.
  3. Triballeau, N., Acher, F., Brabet, I. , Pin, J.-P., and Bertrand, H.-O., "Virtual Screening Workflow Development Guided by the 'Receiver Operating Characteristic' Curve Approach. Application to High-Throughput Docking on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 4," J. Med. Chem. , 2005 , 48 , 2534-2547.
  4. Kontoyianni, M., McClellan, L.M., and Sokol, G.S., "Evaluation of Docking Performance: Comparative Data on Docking Algorithms," J. Med. Chem. , 2004 , 47 , 558-565. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  5. Kroemer, R.T., Vulpetti, A., McDonald, J.J., Rohrer , D.C. , Trosset, J.Y., et al ., "Assessment of Docking Poses: Interactions-Based Accuracy Classification (IBAC) versus Crystal Structure Deviations," J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. , 2004 , 44 871-881. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  6. Asano, T., Yoshikawa, T., Usui, T., Yamamoto, H., Yamamoto, Y., et al ., "Benzamides and Benzamidines as Specific Inhibitors of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and v-Src Protein Tyrosine Kinases," Bioorg. Med. Chem. , 2004 , 12 , 3529-3542. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  7. Gouldson, P.R., Kidley , N.J. , Bywater, R.P., Psaroudakis, G., Brooks, H.D., et al ., "Toward the Active Conformations of Rhodopsin and the ß2-Adrenergic Receptor," Proteins , 2004 , 56 , 67-84. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  8. Krovat, E.M., and Langer, T., "Impact of Scoring Functions on Enrichment in Docking-Based Virtual Screening: An Application Study on Renin Inhibitors," J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. , 2004 , 44 , 1123-1129. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  9. Varady, J., Wu, X., Fang, X., Min, J., Hu, Z., et al ., "Molecular Modeling of the Three-Dimensional Structure of Dopamine 3 (D3) Subtype Receptor: Discovery of Novel and Potent D3 Ligands through a Hybrid Pharmacophore- and Structure-Based Database Searching Approach," J. Med. Chem. , 2003 , 46 , 4377-4392. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  10. Wang, R., Lu, Y., and Wang, S., "Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking," J. Med. Chem. , 2003 , 46 , 2287-2303. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  11. Venkatachalam, C.M., Jiang, X., Oldfield, T., and Waldman, M.,"LigandFit: A Novel Method for the Shape-Directed Rapid Docking of Ligands to Protein Active Sites," J. Mol. Graph. Modell. , 2003 , 21 , 289-307. (LigandFit/LigandScore)
  12. Bertrand, H.O., Bessis, A.S., Pin, J.P., and Acher, F.C., "Common and Selective Molecular Determinants Involved in Metabotopic Glutamate Receptor Agonist Activity," J. Med. Chem. , 2002 , 45 , 3171-3183.
  13. Xu, R.X., Hassell, A.M., Vanderwall, D., Lambert, M.H., Holmes, W.D., et al ., "Atomic Structure of PDE4: Insights Into Phosphodiesterase Mechanism and Specificity," Science , 2000 , 288 , 1822-1825. (LigandFit/LigandScore)

LigandScore

  1. Cotesta, S., Giordanetto, F., Trosset, J.-Y., Crivori, P., Kroemer, R. T., Stouten, P. F.W. and Vulpetti, A., “Virtual Screening to Enrich a Compound Collection with CDK2 Inhibitors Using Docking, Scoring, and Composite Scoring Models," Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. , 2005 , 60 , 629-643.

Ludi

  1. Grembecka, J., Mucha, A., Cierpicki, T., and Kafarski, P. "The Most Potent Organophosphorus Inhibitors of Leucine Aminopeptidase. Structure-Based Design, Chemistry, and Activity," J. Med. Chem. , 2003 , 46 , 2641-2655.
  2. Ji, H., Zhang, W., Zhang, M., Kudo, M., Aoyama, Y., Yoshida, Y., Sheng, C., Song, Y., Yang, S., Zhou, Y., Lu, J., and Zhu, J., "Structure-Based de Novo Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Non-Azole Inhibitors Specific for Lanosterol 14r-Demethylase of Fungi," J. Med. Chem. , 2003 , 46 , 474-485.
  3. Jorgensen, F.S., Christensen, I.T., Johansen, B.N., and Terp, G.E., "A New Concept for Multidimensional Selection of Ligand Conformations (MultiSelect) and Multidimensional Scoring (MultiScore) of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities," J. Med. Chem. , 2001 , 44 , 2333-2343.
  4. Kubinyi, H., "Chance Favors the Prepared Mind-from Serendipity to Rational Drug Design," J. Recept. Signal Transduction , 1999 , 19 , 15-35.
  5. Muegge, I. , and Martin, Y.C., "A General and Fast Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Simplified Potential Approach," J. Med. Chem. , 1999 , 42 , 791-804.
  6. Böhm, H.-J.,"Prediction of Binding Constants of Protein Ligands: a Fast Method for the Prioritization of Hits Obtained from de Novo Design or 3D Database Search Programs," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1998 , 4 , 309-323.
  7. Böhm, H.-J., "Towards the Automatic Design of Synthetically Accessible Protein Ligands: Peptides, Amides and Peptidomimetics," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1996 , 4 , 265-272.
  8. Böhm, H.-J., "On the Use of Ludi to Search the Fine Chemicals Directory for Ligands of Proteins of Known Three-Dimensional Structure," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1994 , 5 , 623-632.
  9. Böhm, H.-J., "The Development of a Simple Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Constant for a Protein-Ligand Complex of Known Three-Dimensional Sturcture," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1994 , 3 , 243-256.
  10. Böhm, H.-J., "A Novel Computational Tool for Automated Structure-Based Drug Design," J. Mol. Recognit. , 1993 , 3 , 131-137.
  11. Böhm, H.-J., "Ludi: Rule-Based Automatic Design of New Substituents for Enzyme Inhibitor Leads," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1992 , 6 , 593-606.
  12. Böhm, H.-J., "The Computer Program Ludi: a New Method for the de Novo Design of Enzyme Inhibitors," J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. , 1992 , 1 , 61-78.

Pharmacophore Modeling and Analysis

  1. Purushottamachar P., et al., “First pharmacophore-based identification of androgen receptor down-regulating agents: discovery of potent anti-prostate cancer agents,” Bioorg Med Chem., 2007 , 15 , 3413-21.
  2. Taha MO , et al., “Discovery of new potent human protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors via pharmacophore and QSAR analysis followed by in silico screening,” J Mol Graph Model. , 2007 , 25 , 870-84.
  3. Agrafiotis, DK, et al., “Conformational Sampling of Bioactive Molecules: A Comparative Study,” J. Chem. Inf. Model. , 2007 , 47(3) , 1067-86

QSAR and Library Design

  1. Cheg, D. et al., “Relationship of quantitative structure and pharmacokinetics in fluoroquinolone antibacterials”, World J Gastroenterol , 2007 , 13(17) , 2496-503
  2. Jiang FC., et al., “The design and synthesis of 2-aminothiazole derivatives and their inhibitory activity on apoptosis”, Yao Xue Xue Bao , 2006 , 41(8) , 727-34
  3. Bednarczyk D., et al., “Influence of molecular structure on substrate binding to the human organic cation transporter, hOCT”, Mol. Pharmacol , 2003 , 63(3) , 489-98

ADMET

  1. Egan,W. J., Merz, K.M., Jr., and Baldwin, J. J., J. Med. Chem. , 2000 , 43 , 3867-3877.
  2. Prentis, R.A., Lis, Y., and Walker, S.R., Br. J. Clin. Pharmac. , 1988 , 25 , 387-396.
  3. Ghose, A. K.,Viswanadhan, V. N., Wendoloski, J. J., J. Phys. Chem. , 1998 , 102 , 3762-3772.